Diary 2023-06-15
Now that I've succeeded in making non-public materials the target of vector search, it's time for Cross-sectional Vector Search, but at this time, I'm having trouble with the unit of the chunk of information...
Now, if you're targeting Scrapbox Cross Search, you've checked the box.
I was thinking, "I'll make it so you can switch search targets later."
Not yet implemented.
Books?
One book is one unit, that's a thousand checkboxes, okay?
Bundling?
Bundling by the same author is the same atmosphere as Scrapbox
Audrey Tan's book, with mixed authorship, bundle?
You can't put it all together mechanically by the author, can you?
It's impossible to make proper groupings for a thousand books in advance.
All in one?
If you consider that a page in a book is a page in Scrapbox, think of 300 pages and 1000 books, and suddenly about 20 times more than my Scrapbox will appear!
dangerous-looking
Oh no, it doesn't have to be all books.
You could add a few "books I have a lot about the same person" in clusters, or you could add a few more.
Virtual "Scrapbox" image of the person
More than a page in a book, more than a page in Scrapbox...
I felt like the publisher would get mad at me for trying to say "poor quality."
Since we have different definitions of "quality," I'll come up with another way to say it.
A page of a book is basically just a long, sticky sentence that is mechanically cut to the same size, so there are no "short, crystallized pages" like there are in Scrapbox.
I think this will probably bring "poor quality search results" to destinations that do vector searches.
Not to be the largest from the beginning.
Possibly something we can see in the process of increasing scale.
If you start out with the largest scale, you lose the opportunity to see that.
And even the current Scrapbox cross-vector search is narrowing people down to begin with.
Is the checkbox necessary in the first place?
A checkbox can represent 2^N pieces of information, but do we need more than "all across" and "one specific" to begin with?
Ah, so that's where you get to "When books are grouped by book, I want to cross-search from books by the same author".
@miiura: The API update has dramatically reduced the execution time of the agent. This is a significant impact for autonomous agents. 🤖
I want to tinker with this one too, not enough time!
For careful deliberation, sharing of prerequisite knowledge is necessary. However, people cannot learn what they do not want to know. Therefore, for deliberation, it is first necessary to arouse "the desire to know" in a large number of people.
Why not visualize the lack of learning and ask, "Do you want to learn or leave the decision to those who have learned?" --- democratic process#648ad4c7aff09e000019926a
@_kayato: Even as social issues become more complex and fragmented, people's cognitive capacity is limited. I feel that deliberation based on prerequisite knowledge has become something that only a few people with the luxury of time can participate in. If it is based on curiosity, there is also the problem of the filter bubble, which is a very difficult issue...
@nishio: sure...I wonder if we could use LLM to streamline learning of prerequisite knowledge and remove bias...
Diary 2023-06-14 ←Diary 2023-06-15 → Diary 2023-06-16
100 days ago Diary 2023-03-07.
1 year ago Diary 2022-06-15.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/日記2023-06-15 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.